Responding to the Attorney General
Last week we wrote you about the fact that Attorney General Bob Ferguson is not only suing Arlene’s Flowers because of her decision not to
Last week we wrote you about the fact that Attorney General Bob Ferguson is not only suing Arlene’s Flowers because of her decision not to
LYNNWOOD, Wash. – The Family Policy Institute of Washington (FPIW) praised today’s decision by the Supreme Court upholding conscience rights and religious freedom of family
As soon as tomorrow, the U.S. Supreme Court will release their decision in lawsuits involving Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties, two family owned businesses
There’s a conflict between non-discrimination laws and religious freedom. Where religious freedom exists to limit government’s intrusion into matters of conscience, non-discrimination laws invite government into private
Last Friday, in the case Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, the Washington State Supreme Court issued a ruling requiring an employer to accommodate the religious dietary requirements of
In 1990, the Supreme Court’s Employment Division v. Smith decision lowered the bar for religious freedom protections. Three years later, Congress responded by passing the Religious Freedom
Copyright © 2024 Family Policy Institute of Washington | Website by ArcFires